[Bug tree-optimization/126751] New: (int)(((unsigned)a) + CST) should be simplified into a + CST if a+CST is known not to overflow in int

"pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126751

            Bug ID: 126751
           Summary: (int)(((unsigned)a) + CST) should be simplified into a
                    + CST if a+CST is known not to overflow in int
           Product: gcc
           Version: 17.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
            Blocks: 126710
  Target Milestone: ---

Noticed for PR 126710 but I thought it would be a good idea to split out:
```
int f(unsigned  t)
{
  int a = __builtin_clzg(t,32); // range is [0,32]
  unsigned b = a;
  b -= 10; // [-10, 22] no overflow in signed integer
  a = b;
  return a;
}
```


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126710
[Bug 126710] missed ifcvt optimization with clz
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.