[gcc r16-9572] c++/reflection: ICE with &template [:members_of():] [PR124794]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a459598063f4a7867aa142e9e1bf49479b91c13

commit r16-9572-g4a459598063f4a7867aa142e9e1bf49479b91c13
Author: Marek Polacek <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Jul 31 11:57:14 2026 -0400

    c++/reflection: ICE with &template [:members_of():] [PR124794]
    
    Given
    
      struct C { template <class T> void f(T); };
    
    we handle "&template [:^^C::f:]" correctly because the spliced
    expression is
    
      BASELINK<OVERLOAD<TEMPLATE_DECL f>>, binfo C>
    
    which is fine: we have an OVERLOAD around the TEMPLATE_DECL and
    lookup_member wrapped the whole thing in a BASELINK.  But when
    we're splicing members_of(^^C, ac)[0], we ended up with
    
      OVERLOAD<TEMPLATE_DECL f>>
    
    and then go down the wrong path in cp_parser_splice_expression.
    
    splice already correctly adds the missing OVERLOAD but it also
    needs to (maybe) add a BASELINK.
    
    This patch also adjusts baselink_for_fns to gain a parameter
    controlling if we want to ignore currently_open_derived_class.
    It matters when we're in a member function of a class derived
    from C and the object argument of the -> is a different derived class,
    as exercised in splice17.C: pd->[:g1:] (42); in D2::mfn.  There, if
    we didn't ignore currently_open_derived_class, the BASELINK would
    use D2 as the access_binfo, which is wrong because it has no
    derivation relationship to the object type (here D1).  With this
    patch access_binfo will be C, which is what members_of gave us.
    
            PR c++/124794
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * cp-tree.h (baselink_for_fns): Adjust declaration.
            * parser.cc (cp_parser_reflect_expression): Adjust the call to
            baselink_for_fns.
            * reflect.cc (splice): Call baselink_for_fns.
            * semantics.cc (baselink_for_fns): Add a bool parameter.  If
            it's true, ignore currently_open_derived_class.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/reflect/splice17.C: New test.
    
    Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <[email protected]>
    (cherry picked from commit 8fb57eda04f88f4e0d1cbbcc209533fd9689dd9d)

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                        |  2 +-
 gcc/cp/parser.cc                        |  2 +-
 gcc/cp/reflect.cc                       |  5 +++
 gcc/cp/semantics.cc                     | 17 ++++----
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice17.C | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index fb0965872661..724f8aa72e81 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -8653,7 +8653,7 @@ extern void finish_transaction_stmt		(tree, tree, int, tree);
 extern tree build_transaction_expr		(location_t, tree, int, tree);
 extern bool cxx_omp_create_clause_info		(tree, tree, bool, bool,
 						 bool, bool);
-extern tree baselink_for_fns                    (tree);
+extern tree baselink_for_fns                    (tree, bool = false);
 extern void finish_static_assert                (tree, tree, location_t,
 						 bool, bool, bool = false);
 extern tree finish_decltype_type                (tree, bool, tsubst_flags_t);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index fa2fec614895..bf981945aa05 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -10183,7 +10183,7 @@ cp_parser_reflect_expression (cp_parser *parser)
 	&& !concept_check_p (t))
       t = finish_template_variable (t);
     else if (is_overloaded_fn (t))
-      t = baselink_for_fns (t);
+      t = baselink_for_fns (t, /*ignore_current_class_p=*/true);
     if (cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser))
       return get_reflection (loc, t);
   }
diff --git a/gcc/cp/reflect.cc b/gcc/cp/reflect.cc
index 952551e9f95c..34189ffc80dc 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/reflect.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/reflect.cc
@@ -8778,6 +8778,11 @@ splice (tree refl)
      it comes from e.g. members_of it is not.  */
   if (DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P (refl))
     refl = ovl_make (refl, NULL_TREE);
+  /* Also add a BASELINK so that we handle &[:R:].  Since R was already
+     resolved (e.g. via members_of), we don't want to consider the enclosing
+     class for the access path.  */
+  if (is_overloaded_fn (refl))
+    refl = baselink_for_fns (refl, /*ignore_current_class_p=*/true);
 
   return refl;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
index 18808354b6e8..d8a623c201ce 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -4505,23 +4505,22 @@ finish_base_specifier (tree base, tree access, bool virtual_p,
 /* If FNS is a member function, a set of member functions, or a
    template-id referring to one or more member functions, return a
    BASELINK for FNS, incorporating the current access context.
-   Otherwise, return FNS unchanged.  */
+   Otherwise, return FNS unchanged.  If IGNORE_CURRENT_CLASS_P is
+   true, we do not consider the currently open derived class.  */
 
 tree
-baselink_for_fns (tree fns)
+baselink_for_fns (tree fns, bool ignore_current_class_p/*=false*/)
 {
-  tree scope;
-  tree cl;
-
-  if (BASELINK_P (fns)
-      || error_operand_p (fns))
+  if (BASELINK_P (fns) || error_operand_p (fns))
     return fns;
 
-  scope = ovl_scope (fns);
+  tree scope = ovl_scope (fns);
   if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (scope))
     return fns;
 
-  cl = currently_open_derived_class (scope);
+  tree cl = (ignore_current_class_p
+	     ? NULL_TREE
+	     : currently_open_derived_class (scope));
   if (!cl)
     cl = scope;
   tree access_path = TYPE_BINFO (cl);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice17.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice17.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..634b58534722
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/reflect/splice17.C
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+// PR c++/124794
+// { dg-do compile { target c++26 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-freflection" }
+
+#include <meta>
+
+struct C {
+  template <class T> void f(T);
+  void g (int);
+
+  static constexpr int val = 42;
+};
+
+constexpr auto ac = std::meta::access_context::current();
+constexpr auto f1 = members_of(^^C, ac)[0];
+constexpr auto f2 = ^^C::f;
+void (C::*p1)(int) = &template [:f1:];
+void (C::*p2)(int) = &template [:f2:];
+
+constexpr auto g1 = members_of(^^C, ac)[1];
+constexpr auto g2 = ^^C::g;
+void (C::*p3)(int) = &[:g1:];
+void (C::*p4)(int) = &[:g2:];
+
+void
+g (C *pc)
+{
+  auto p = &pc->[: ^^C::val :];
+  auto q = &pc->C::val;
+
+  pc->f (42);
+  pc->template [:f1:](42);
+  pc->template [:f2:](42);
+  pc->g (42);
+  pc->[:g1:] (42);
+  pc->[:g2:] (42);
+}
+
+struct D1 : C {
+  void mfn (D1 *pd)
+  {
+    auto p = &pd->[: ^^C::val :];
+    auto q = &pd->C::val;
+
+    pd->f (42);
+    pd->template [:f1:](42);
+    pd->template [:f2:](42);
+    pd->g (42);
+    pd->[:g1:] (42);
+    pd->[:g2:] (42);
+  }
+};
+
+struct D2 : C {
+  void mfn (D1 *pd)
+  {
+    auto p = &pd->[: ^^C::val :];
+    auto q = &pd->C::val;
+
+    constexpr auto rg = ^^C::g;
+    pd->[:rg:] (42);
+    constexpr auto rf = ^^C::f;
+    pd->template [:rf:] (42);
+
+    pd->f (42);
+    pd->template [:f1:](42);
+    pd->template [:f2:](42);
+    pd->g (42);
+    pd->[:g1:] (42);
+    pd->[:g2:] (42);
+  }
+};