Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time.

"James K. Lowden" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.devel
Organization COBOLworx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:07:38 -0400
David Malcolm via Gcc <[email protected]> wrote:

> Grepping for TV_THREAD_PROLOGUE_AND_EPILOGUE, I see two passes in
> function.cc that account their time to this timevar:
> pass_thread_prologue_and_epilogue and
> pass_late_thread_prologue_and_epilogue.
> 
> Both of these passes ultimately call the function
> rest_of_handle_thread_prologue_and_epilogue.
> 
> So the slowdown is presumably somewhere inside there.

When I compiled Bob's example program under Linux perf and examined it
with hotspot, it showed about 1/2 the time is spent in
lra_process_new_insns.  100% of that time, 5 levels down, is
bitmap_list_find_element.  A little higher up, 73% overall is spent in
the caller, do_reload.

I suspect that's too late in the game.  I'm observing the optimizer
doing its job, not why it has any job to do.  But I was wrong once, not
very long ago, actually, and not the first time then, either.  So I
pass it along.  

--jkl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.