Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list

"Richard Earnshaw \(foss\) via Gcc" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.ai.sourceware.forge
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 02/04/2026 21:23, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 11:18:39 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> One thing to add: the linaro bot currently updates existing comments so 
>>> it will be good to figure out which messages are a "final state" and 
>>> either make the bot recognize them or mark them with <!-- bmm:send -->.
>>
>> Hmmm thanks to your help & suggestions a few months ago I managed to 
>> reduce the amount of comments generated by the Linaro bot using these 
>> HTML markers/comments: now it updates comments in place when the status 
>> changes (pending/running/completed).
>> How to detect a comment is the final one I'm not sure (if there's a 
>> crash during the "running" phase, there will probably never be a 
>> "completed" update).
> 
> Can Linaro bot not submit a custom status to the CI metadata rather than
> a comment? (I'm more familiar with GitLab than Forgejo.)
> 
> --Ben

I suspect the best solution would be if we could re-implement the Linaro bot as a runner.  But there are security implications that would need to be investigate for that, since the runner would then be managed by the forge (sent jobs), but would be in a separate administrative/security domain.

R.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.