Re: [RFC] On sending forge pull request discussions to the mailing list

"Richard Earnshaw (foss)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.ai.sourceware.forge,gmane.comp.gcc.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 08/04/2026 18:42, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 14:59:07 +0100, Richard Earnshaw (foss) wrote:
>> Isn't that limited to one result though?  What if there were multiple
>> CIs running.  They would need to collude in order to update that.
> 
> Not AFAIK. As long as the context is different, it should be a separate
> status item when rendered. If the context is the same, the status is
> updated with any new description, state, and/or target URL. At least if
> it works anything like GitHub and GitLab's analogous APIs.
> 
> So Linaro CI could send a "pending" status when it first gets the job to
> indicate that it is working and then update with a new state once it
> completes. There may be size limits on description as it usually shows
> up as a tooltip (on GitLab at least) and the target URL is the
> destination when clicked.
> 
> --Ben

Oh, I see.  I'd missed the 'context' field giving the option for multiple reports.

Yes, I think that could work.

Thanks for the pointer.

R.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.