Re: Sourceware Survey results and Budget priority discussions

Mark Wielaard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 04:18:49PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The results of the Sourceware Survey 2026 are in!
> https://sourceware.org/survey-2026
> 
> And since tomorrow is the second Friday of the month it is also
> Sourceware Open Office time!
> 
> Come and lets discuss the Survey results and see what they mean for
> our Budget priorities this year.

For those that couldn't attend:

- Discussed upgrading forgejo and moving the forge to a bigger faster
  virtual machine (vm02) in the new datacenter this weekend. The new
  setup is like the forge-stage setup, so it will be easier to move to
  an Ansible setup and more admins can help out.

  [This has now been completed, please yell and scream if
  https://forge.sourceware.org is acting up after the transfer.]

- https://sourceware.org/survey-2026
  The survey ran from Friday, 20 March to Friday, 3 April. There were
  84 responses. Which amounts to ~20% of "active developers",
  depending how you define that (there are ~400 people with
  ssh/gitolite push access, if you ignore those that have been
  explicitly disabled because of non-activity). Of those that
  responded ~70% are active committers, ~60% has a bugzilla account,
  ~31% edit wikis, ~30% have editbugs rights, ~26% has a forge
  account, 20% has a patchwork account, ~12% are bugzilla admins and
  ~13% are admins/list moderators.

- There was various actionable feedback to help contributors feel
  engaged and maybe become more regular contributors. The most
  requested initiative (26%) was Forgejo process improvements. The
  least requested were hardware keys (11%). But it wasn't clear if
  people had fully read the plans descriptions at
  https://sourceware.org/sourceware-security-vision.html#plans
  One of the issues discussed was what a dedicated sysadmin could do
  for us. So we probably should expand the written out plans a bit and
  integrate the other feedback.

- Cygwin has some requirements no other project as because they want
  to produce Windows binaries. But we currently don't have a Windows
  buildbot builder to move off using Appveyor and GitHub (issue for
  some contributors). Also there is no CodeSign support. We will
  discuss options with OSUOSL and Conservancy.

- Good to see ~10% has donated to Sourceware
  https://sourceware.org/donate last year we estimated that to
  replace/renew hardware we would need ~3 years. It looks like we can
  fill out hardware fund in just ~1 year.

- Next up is updating our budget proposals with the new feedback and
  create a write up for our individual/corporate/grant organizations
  and donors to present with the new (financial) year overview (which
  starts May 15th).

- For the forge Claudio is working on the big patch set for "Send all
  PR discussion to mailing list"
  https://forge.sourceware.org/forge/batrachomyomachia/issues/15
  Done is the functionality that deals with the situations where
  people perform reviews, explicitly ask for review, send a command
  and send a single comment. Todo is when a pull request is closed and
  a summary must be sent and a manual "send everything to the mailing
  list" to deal with all the existing closed pull requests.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.