Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes

NightStrike via Gcc <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.devel
Message-ID <CAF1jjLvhRp+GN6p4gM=L-NWoCY3CTx5Jh7ZpXthSSN2kMfqhXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 09:07 Christopher Albert via Gcc <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> So in practice for the GCC project I see a very low risk, and as the
> person who signs off the contribution I am willing to take it.


There is one tertiary risk that isn’t often discussed in any project. Do
you remember when having a GPS in your car first became popular? Everyone
would buy a Garmin and have it suction cupped to the windshield and use it
for going everywhere. At least in my circle of friends, we quickly realized
there was a rapid and astounding psychological impact whereby we simply
“forgot” how to navigate from A to B. Our brains adapted to the tool and
discarded the skills required to remember how to move around.

Unleashing a heavy reliance on automated tools has the nonzero probability
of significantly reducing the already scarce knowledge and experience of
large scale codebases.

See this clip from the TNG episode When the Bough Breaks:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mA9fcTJGXf0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.