Re: Transitioning libgomp from C to C++ implementation

Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.devel
Organization BayLibre
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Martin Uecker <[email protected]> writes:

> I understand this, but this is true also for libubsan and still people
> reimplement libubsan in C because the C++ version does not seem to fit
> their needs. I do not know the exact reasons, and I am also not sure
> those would apply to libgomp.

Without knowing specifics, I'd wager that's more likely to be due to
libsanitizers than C++.
-- 
Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 430 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEKBAEWCgCyFiEE/uKz0RP8AKMWLWBhUsKUMB6ixJMFAmn927IbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z
Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRUUyQjNEMTEzRkMwMEEzMTYyRDYw
NjE1MkMyOTQzMDFFQTJDNDkzGBxhYXJzZW5vdmljQGJheWxpYnJlLmNvbQAKCRBS
wpQwHqLEk3GeAP9MQSkkVEIiOdX999QHY/oBItTPyY/EqCL7gkeSv8e+wwD+MALy
6aZ7SW6kGEg9rJJEOm4opWscm/BOBwI5vfKTBw4=
=3wV1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.