Re: Is it time to take the middle-end stringop/array warnings out of -Wall?
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | BayLibre |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> writes: > The point is that if using -Wextra, you should expect some warnings > that are "hard to avoid ... no simple way to modify the code to > suppress the warning" (whereas such warnings are outside the > documented scope of -Wall). Yes, I agree. I'm just saying that I think that, beyond just moving into -Wextra, the wording needs to be made less certain ("there is" -> "there may be" or so). -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 430 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEKBAEWCgCyFiEE/uKz0RP8AKMWLWBhUsKUMB6ixJMFAmoO3UAbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRUUyQjNEMTEzRkMwMEEzMTYyRDYw NjE1MkMyOTQzMDFFQTJDNDkzGBxhYXJzZW5vdmljQGJheWxpYnJlLmNvbQAKCRBS wpQwHqLEk1TaAP9c1040z/3kEww6LOtY+MI/tCho2OI6Bz/h3wDLBvyVQAEAkbt5 3q/InLtNUEZvtMS0ZfO5oNxSaRBvKA9OqcIeZAg= =EbV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----