Re: Is it time to take the middle-end stringop/array warnings out of -Wall?
Sam James via Gcc <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> writes: > Joseph Myers <[email protected]> writes: > >> The point is that if using -Wextra, you should expect some warnings >> that are "hard to avoid ... no simple way to modify the code to >> suppress the warning" (whereas such warnings are outside the >> documented scope of -Wall). > > Yes, I agree. > > I'm just saying that I think that, beyond just moving into -Wextra, the > wording needs to be made less certain ("there is" -> "there may be" or > so). So, something like: 1) move to -Wextra; 2) change phrasing; 3) add diagnostic group -Wmiddle-end (name pending); 4) drop from -Wextra now you can conveniently use them via the group. then? sam
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 418 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmoPLYsbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkGPv AQDLdqGYp9va/HU9ViWJVWqGdpcWspSbPo89SIgxCat65AEAl3BWcHcUlbvL1nYz GElvfEN4zNx/tXjx8cjCmBjmxws= =mRRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----