Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 19:17:30 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH6eHdSRE_6K38sxYu8RjRiE5V_5iB7R2bPAsGYTJXVjo6ckhA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, 1 Aug 2026, 13:35 Basile STARYNKEVITCH, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > related to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2026-August/248648.html > > > > > # Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: > > # (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this > > License > > # giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it. > > > > so copyrighting the software is a means to an end, not an end in > > itself. > > > > What happens if a patch contains a non-trival amount of code that > > cannot be copyrighted because it was assisted by AI? > > > > If some third party were to distribute a binary of gcc, they would > > still be obliged to distribute the source that is covered by the > > GPLv3. > > > I tend to agree (long time ago I was involved in GCC: > https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0779 ...) at that time using AI inspired > techniques. > > > I also don't understand what is AI assisted code generation, because > that requires a (computable) definition of AI. > The policy doesn't use the phrase "AI assisted", which is intentional. Is the policy unclear? > Are software projects like refpersys.org (source code below) considered > as "AI"? > > Are code generators like https://carburetta.com/ considered as AI (they > do use some clever AI techniques, and could be extended to use even > better one). > > Is a large GNU emacs plugin or software using machine learning > techniques (e.g. extending or above or using or related to > https://github.com/magikerwin/ML-From-Scratch-With-CPP ...) > > In some countries (including mine, France) a lot of GCC code can be and > has been funded thru calls (or sponsors) related to artificial > intelligence? > > Thos interested by that topic might look also at > http://bootstrappingartificialintelligence.fr/WordPress3/ > and a few books by Jacques Pitrat (see wikipedia). > > The current many GCC plugins and extensions could be (and sometimes > are) considered as "AI". > > Thanks for reading. > > NB: I now work on refpersys.org and it is a GPL licensed C++ inference > engine for expert systems. Help is accepted. > > -- > > Basile STARYNKEVITCH > <[email protected]> > 8 rue de la Fa=C3=AFencerie > http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ > 92340 Bourg-la-Reine > https://github.com/bstarynk > France > https://github.com/RefPerSys/RefPerSys > https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-5250 >