Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> writes:

> Am 01.08.26 um 21:00 schrieb Sam James:
>>> What happens if a patch contains a non-trival amount of code that
>>> cannot be copyrighted because it was assisted by AI?
>> The open questions around this are why the GNU project issued
>> provisional guidance to reject significant contributions developed with
>> an LLM.
>> If it is copyrightable, then who owns the copyright? If it's based
>> on
>> the training data, then the contributor may not have the rights to
>> share such a patch, and it cannot be legally redistributed under the GPL
>> (or any licence).
>
> That is one of the clearer points right now - LLM-generated code cannot
> be copyrighted.

Again, the GNU project guidance was to wait. Anyway, if this is the
case, you can launder any GPL project.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmpubcwbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z
Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx
QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkC9U
AP45UTw+8hyOCJnZXMkNlCE2Ti1ac181Q27f1uLdm2tXswEA7JfPOjiKzaIft/3P
ADf4+1laqfU2/bPt6gYlZn7iPgM=
=qtke
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--