Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement

Am 02.08.26 um 00:06 schrieb Sam James via Gcc:
> Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Am 01.08.26 um 21:00 schrieb Sam James:
>>>> What happens if a patch contains a non-trival amount of code that
>>>> cannot be copyrighted because it was assisted by AI?
>>> The open questions around this are why the GNU project issued
>>> provisional guidance to reject significant contributions developed with
>>> an LLM.
>>> If it is copyrightable, then who owns the copyright? If it's based
>>> on
>>> the training data, then the contributor may not have the rights to
>>> share such a patch, and it cannot be legally redistributed under the GPL
>>> (or any licence).
>>
>> That is one of the clearer points right now - LLM-generated code cannot
>> be copyrighted.
> 
> Again, the GNU project guidance was to wait.

Hm, OK, to the project's detriment :-(

> Anyway, if this is the case, you can launder any GPL project.

What does the mean?

Best regards

	Thomas