Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Thomas Koenig via Gcc <[email protected]> writes:

> Am 01.08.26 um 21:00 schrieb Sam James:
>>> What happens if a patch contains a non-trival amount of code that
>>> cannot be copyrighted because it was assisted by AI?
>> The open questions around this are why the GNU project issued
>> provisional guidance to reject significant contributions developed with
>> an LLM.
>> If it is copyrightable, then who owns the copyright? If it's based
>> on
>> the training data, then the contributor may not have the rights to
>> share such a patch, and it cannot be legally redistributed under the GPL
>> (or any licence).
> [...]
>
> To put it bluntly: The current policy is based on a risk assessment
> that nobody shares

Here's a few that come to mind:

* https://openjdk.org/legal/ai
* https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html
* the GNU project overall
* https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/code-provenance.html#use-of-ai-generated-content

sam

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEBBAEWCgCpFiEEJaa7iN2bdkxrVUHCc4QJ9SDfkZAFAmpvptkbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z
Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQyNUE2QkI4OEREOUI3NjRDNkI1NTQx
QzI3Mzg0MDlGNTIwREY5MTkwDxxzYW1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBzhAn1IN+RkK3q
AQDvTE8VQXblZf2Wu1lHYHA1JQwsFOKauHwmbRaNqchmcAEAy+aKw8vrMmpmLyaj
DmNtGJnbQ8aoYERi53xmkeZdFQA=
=DjoQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--