[PATCH 14/22] Coarray caf_shmem final patch set
Jerry D <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-February/063551.html See attached. Awaiting approval.
caf_shmem-14-of-22.patch
(text/x-patch, 3.9 KB)
From 37ab61c272586857c3f40e9e9e2c0165e26bdb05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre Vehreschild <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 11:13:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: Fix form team in caf_shmem [PR124071] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Form team w/o new_index= tried to compute the new_index assuming that images are scattered onto to teams. I.e. the distribution is: Image index: 1 2 3 4 5 6 New team no: 1 2 1 2 1 2 , i.e. scattered But this algorithm failed, when the images were linearly distributed into the new teams, like in: Image index: 1 2 3 4 5 6 New team no: 1 1 1 2 2 2 The new approach is to look up a free index in the new team, when the computed one is already taken. Because F2018, 11.6.9, ยง4 states the new index is processor dependent, it feels safe to do it this way. PR fortran/124071 libgfortran/ChangeLog: * caf/shmem.c (_gfortran_caf_form_team): Take free index, when computed one is already taken. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/coarray/form_team_1.f90: New test. --- .../gfortran.dg/coarray/form_team_1.f90 | 18 ++++++++ libgfortran/caf/shmem.c | 45 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/form_team_1.f90 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/form_team_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/form_team_1.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e685efeb378 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/form_team_1.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +!{ dg-do run } + +program main + use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only: team_type + implicit none + type(team_type) :: team + integer :: slice_size, team_no + + if (num_images() >= 3) then + slice_size = num_images() / 3 + team_no = this_image() / slice_size + 1 + + form team (team_no, team) + + sync all + end if + +end program diff --git a/libgfortran/caf/shmem.c b/libgfortran/caf/shmem.c index 1ef36cde1ac..9913db6d709 100644 --- a/libgfortran/caf/shmem.c +++ b/libgfortran/caf/shmem.c @@ -1768,26 +1768,51 @@ _gfortran_caf_form_team (int team_no, caf_team_t *team, int *new_index, } else { - int im; - int exp = -1; + int im, cnt; + int exp; __atomic_fetch_add (&t->u.image_info->image_map_size, 1, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); sync_team (caf_current_team); - im = caf_current_team->index * t->u.image_info->image_map_size + cnt = t->u.image_info->image_map_size; + /* Try to map the source team's images linearly into the domain of the + new team. This works for scattered teams distributions. I.e. when a + set of images is distritubed in this way: + Image no: 1 2 3 4 5 6 + New team: 1 2 1 2 1 2 + but not for: + Image no: 1 2 3 4 5 6 + New team: 1 1 1 2 2 2 + */ + im = caf_current_team->index * cnt / caf_current_team->u.image_info->image_count.count; /* Map our old index into the domain of the new team's size. */ - if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n (&t->u.image_info->image_map[im], &exp, - this_image.image_num, false, - __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)) - t->index = im; - else + do { - caf_internal_error (cannot_assign_index, stat, errmsg, errmsg_len); - return; + /* (Re-)set exp. */ + exp = -1; + if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n (&t->u.image_info->image_map[im], + &exp, this_image.image_num, false, + __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)) + { + t->index = im; + goto form_team_finish; + } + /* Find a free new_index in the newly formed team for this image. + There no longer is any order to the teams. */ + ++im; + if (im >= t->u.image_info->image_map_size) + im = 0; + --cnt; } + while (cnt > 0); + + caf_internal_error (cannot_assign_index, stat, errmsg, errmsg_len); + return; } + +form_team_finish: sync_team (caf_current_team); caf_teams_formed = t; -- 2.53.0