Re: [PATCH 22/22] Coarray caf_shmem final patch set
Jerry D <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/25/26 5:53 AM, Toon Moene wrote: > On 2/24/26 23:06, Toon Moene wrote: > >> On 2/24/26 23:03, Jerry D wrote: >> >>> Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2026-February/063551.html >>> >>> See attached. >>> >>> Awaiting approval. >>> >>> This is the last one. >> >> Thanks, Jerry for this arduous work. I received all of them, in order, so I >> will work to test them tomorrow. > > The test completed: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2026-February/870199.html > > One small patch difference: > > patching file gcc/fortran/resolve.cc > Hunk #1 succeeded at 14271 (offset 7 lines). > > My "random-weather" test program functions as previously. > > The "locks" test program: > > (export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/compilers/install/gcc/lib64:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH; time ./ > a.out) > Expected: 64 Found: 64 > Expected: 640 Found: 640 > Expected: 6400 Found: 6400 > Expected: 64000 Found: 64000 > Expected: 640000 Found: 640000 > Expected: 6400000 Found: 6400000 > > real 0m3.349s > user 0m4.431s > sys 3m17.081s > > Looks great, all together ! > > Kind regards, > I will push this tomorrow morning if no RM objections. Best regards to all, Jerry