Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes

Jerry D via Gcc <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/17/26 11:55 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 at 19:22, Jerry D via Gcc <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> First I apologize for the broken thread, my email client, operator error.
>>
>> I sense a lot of contention from the text of this thread which I read off of the
>> archives.
>>
>> Since I started this thread, I thought I should step in.  I think folks may be
>> missing an important aspect of this.
> 
> I think you might be too.

No not really, the legal aspect is the whole reason I asked the question.
> 
--- snip ---
> 
> The topic of the thread has not been about whether the output is good
> quality or not.
> 
> It's about the legal status of the generated output, and whether that
> is something the project can accept.
> 

Indeed, like I said above . We gotta do it right.

Cheers,

Jerry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.