Re: GCC AI Policy Announcement

> I would like to get clarifications on the labelling requirement with
> Assisted-By.  The policy talks about "including output" and "LLM
> generated content" but avoids talking about derivative work of LLM
> generated content.  When I use LLM to prototype an idea and then go
> a) implement the result myself, b) edit the result [significantly],
> c) use it to create an improved implementation this is clearly
> "assisted by an LLM", does it require labelling with Assisted-By?  I
> think the same legal issues are present?

This is part of the core legal issue being discussed.  The specific
point being debated is "how much human input is required to make LLM
output become copyrightable".  As I said, the only guidance we have from
the US Copyright Office talks about art, which is a very different domain.

So I would suggest that the policy specifically address the above issue
if it doesn't already.  My suggestion is that the policy should apply
*only* to LLM-generated content where there was either no human editing
or trivial human editing.