Ping: [Patch, fortran] PR110626 - [13/14/15/16/17 regression] Duplicated finalization in derived

Paul Richard Thomas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran
Message-ID <CAGkQGiKDipaN-kV4vyHnqrhd=D4Ljy9mDRa4mE3_6GUcG2ezUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello All,

I am engaged in a long overdue effort to clear the PRs assigned to me
so that I can get on with completing the PDT meta-bug.

Please excuse me for the ping but I would like to avoid too much of a backlog.

Cheers

Paul

On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 at 14:40, Paul Richard Thomas
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> This patch by Christopher Albert, with assistance from both GPT and
> Claude, pushes the suggested limit of ~15 lines sourced from LLMs.
> However, I think that it is a sufficiently important regression as to
> be given consideration. I have checked it over and cannot fault it. I
> reduced the verbosity of the comments somewhat.
>
> OK for all active branches after regression testing on each and a
> delay between mainline and the others?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.