Re: [Patch, fortran] PR110626 - [13/14/15/16/17 regression] Duplicated finalization in derived

Hello Jerry and Toon,

Thanks for the review; especially being corrected on attributions.
This was a sin of omission, rather than commission, as you will
discern from the text in the enclosing email. Sorry about that!

Pushed as r17-3317 and backported to 16-branch. I will wait a few
weeks before backporting to the other branches.

Cheers

Paul

On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 at 16:41, Toon Moene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/26 17:19, Jerry Delisle wrote:
>
> > ```Yes, this is ok, thanks Paul```
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026, 6:40 AM Paul Richard Thomas
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Hello All,
> >
> >     This patch by Christopher Albert, with assistance from both GPT and
> >     Claude, pushes the suggested limit of ~15 lines sourced from LLMs.
> >     However, I think that it is a sufficiently important regression as to
> >     be given consideration. I have checked it over and cannot fault it. I
> >     reduced the verbosity of the comments somewhat.
> >
> >     OK for all active branches after regression testing on each and a
> >     delay between mainline and the others?
> >
> >     Cheers
> >
> >     Paul
> >
> I got a request from one member of the working group on AI policy:
>
> "Hi Paul,
>
> Could you clarify what you mean by "sourced from"? If the lines came
> from an LLM, please make sure to use the Assisted-by git trailer
> mentioned at https://gcc.gnu.org/ai-policy.html under 'Transparency &
> Accountability'.
>
> Also, if the patch by Christopher Albert, he should be the git author,
> so use git commit --amend --author="Christopher Albert
> <[email protected]>". You can add yourself as Co-authored-by if you did
> some work on it too."
>
> I think it is important to take this advice in consideration.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Toon Moene - e-mail: [email protected] - phone: +31 346 214290
> Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands