Re: mailing list moderation
"David A. Cobb" <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:37:55 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.gnat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1891459281== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070208040707000108080606" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070208040707000108080606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't know whether the list is still useful. So much depends on how the community here relates to the gcc maintainers. I understand most of their work appears on gcc-help (but I've been wrong once or twice before). I would propose moving to a "sign-up to post" policy for starters. Spam and Virus filters wouldn't be a bad idea; a spam filter could shunt the questionable posts aside for moderation. As to that, I would volunteer for some moderation duties. Perhaps we should talk off-list. Karl Berry wrote: > Greetings, > > It appears that this mailing list, [email protected], (among many others), > has no known owner/moderator, and accepts mail from non-subscribers. > The result is passing through of lots of spam. > > So we need to do something. I'm writing to get input on the best thing > to do. Please reply to me if you have any thoughts on the following: > > (1) If this list is obsolete and should be deleted. We'd keep the > archives, just make the address inactive, so any future mail to it > would bounce. > > (2) If the list is *not* obsolete, and should remain as a live address. > In many cases there is so much junk in the archives that it is hard > to tell, hence my query. In other cases, I could guess, but I felt > it would be best to just inquire about everything. > > In case (2), if you can volunteer to help moderate the list (and/or > others!), that would be most appreciated. But even if not, I'd still > like to know if the list is still live; I'm recruiting volunteer > moderators to help with the job. > > Any other information or suggestions is welcome too. For example, if > someone is already administering the list but just isn't listed in the > mailman interface. > > Thanks much, > Karl > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-gnat mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnat > > -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate "By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr. Free at last! Free at last! Using Linux, I'm FREE at last! Life is too short to tolerate crappy software! --------------070208040707000108080606 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#3333ff"> <font size="+1">I don't know whether the list is still useful. So much depends on how the community here relates to the gcc maintainers. I understand most of their work appears on gcc-help (but I've been wrong once or twice before).<br> <br> I would propose moving to a "sign-up to post" policy for starters. Spam and Virus filters wouldn't be a bad idea; a spam filter could shunt the questionable posts aside for moderation.<br> <br> As to that, I would volunteer for some moderation duties. Perhaps we should talk off-list.<br> </font><br> Karl Berry wrote: <blockquote cite="[email protected]" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Greetings, It appears that this mailing list, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>, (among many others), has no known owner/moderator, and accepts mail from non-subscribers. The result is passing through of lots of spam. So we need to do something. I'm writing to get input on the best thing to do. Please reply to me if you have any thoughts on the following: (1) If this list is obsolete and should be deleted. We'd keep the archives, just make the address inactive, so any future mail to it would bounce. (2) If the list is *not* obsolete, and should remain as a live address. In many cases there is so much junk in the archives that it is hard to tell, hence my query. In other cases, I could guess, but I felt it would be best to just inquire about everything. In case (2), if you can volunteer to help moderate the list (and/or others!), that would be most appreciated. But even if not, I'd still like to know if the list is still live; I'm recruiting volunteer moderators to help with the job. Any other information or suggestions is welcome too. For example, if someone is already administering the list but just isn't listed in the mailman interface. Thanks much, Karl _______________________________________________ Help-gnat mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnat">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnat</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate "By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr. Free at last! Free at last! Using Linux, I'm FREE at last! Life is too short to tolerate crappy software! </pre> </body> </html> --------------070208040707000108080606-- --===============1891459281== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Help-gnat mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnat --===============1891459281==--