Re: Any plans to integrate just binutils‑gdb into GCC?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc-help <[email protected]> writes:

> LLVM/Clang generates LLVM IR, not necessarily object files. Also thin
> lto works very well for clang and llvm while for GCC to use lto, the
> compilation is extremely slow to the point of useless.

No it isn't.  GCC LTO is applied widely.  My entire system is built with
GCC + -flto.

> BTW, supporting --sysroot --target does not mean $target-gcc couldn't exi=
st any more for those legacy systems. It is just for new system, we should =
move to just gcc --target --sysroot, not $cross-gcc

Patches welcome.
=2D-=20
Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEKBAEWCgCyFiEE/uKz0RP8AKMWLWBhUsKUMB6ixJMFAmph6hAbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25z
Lm9wZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRUUyQjNEMTEzRkMwMEEzMTYyRDYw
NjE1MkMyOTQzMDFFQTJDNDkzGBxhYXJzZW5vdmljQGJheWxpYnJlLmNvbQAKCRBS
wpQwHqLEk8RqAQC5Hk7KovyrFbR+Ar/km8TOl9yn801s/NP5etR8zkkUmwD8DHlb
1Wt94tmRGMh0ako9S7LAZQ3GStgsIcY/Us6MYgg=
=9qGW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--