native code performance
Marco Canini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I've been experimenting with using gcj native binary compilation for the following problem. I'm seeking to integrate the weka machine learning toolkit in a C++ program. Weka is 100% java code. I've learned about CNI and it sounds quite an appealing solution for the integration part. However, before writing the C++ code, I tried to see what the performance are when the java code is compiled to a native binary. Basically what I did was the following: I compiled the weka source code using gcj (ecj) to a .jar (bytecode). I wrote a simple program that actually uses the toolkit to run a classifier. I compiled this program into a class. I linked everything into a native binary with the -findirect-dispatch option. As I'm new to gcj I might have done something wrong during this process, but it seems alright given my understanding of the gcj manual. Although I actually don't know where I should have enabled the optimizations (-O2) Now comes the unattended result. I ran the native binary and it took 13.4s to execute a classification test. When using sun's java, the program (in this case the .class) executes in 3.2s! I had expected a native binary to outperform the VM. So here my question is very simple: is this result realistic or i'm just missing the magic to speed the native binary up? Thanks -- Marco Canini