Re: classpath-0.98 merge for GCC-4.4
Matthias Klose <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Haley schrieb: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > >> Ideally, I'd prefer a GCJ release to be based on a Classpath >> release, if just so bug reports against GCJ 4.4 can be more >> closely linked to a Classpath release. > > Me too. > >> That said, I think the tree is in okay shape at the moment. If >> you do merge now, I'd suggest using the time to test the >> completed merge, especially the new locale changes. > > Yes. > >> As a third option, perhaps the main merge could be done now, >> covering all the feature changes (GJDoc, localisation). I >> could then submit the remaining bug fixes planned for 0.98 to >> GCJ separately, as they get sent to Classpath. We'd then end >> up with 0.98 in GCJ (effectively). > > That's my suggestion, as long as it doesn't make too much work > for Doko. I can start working on this on a merge branch. But being on a conference I'm not sure that I will finish this before my vacation until the end of August. In the past Joshua did offer to do a merge as well. Joshua, would you be able to work on this merge as well? Matthias