Re: Build failure with the 0.98 merge
Andrew Haley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew John Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm getting a build error when trying to compile the version of GCJ > merged with Classpath 0.98: Is this when building gcc itself, or a local merge, i.e. can I look at this for myself? > In file included from > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:25: > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/java/lang/StringBuffer.h:97: > error: 'java::lang::AbstractStringBuffer* > java::lang::StringBuffer::StringBuffer$append(jchar)' cannot be > overloaded > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/java/lang/StringBuffer.h:38: > error: with 'virtual java::lang::StringBuffer* > java::lang::StringBuffer::StringBuffer$append(jchar)' > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/java/lang/StringBuffer.h:100: > error: 'java::lang::AbstractStringBuffer* > java::lang::StringBuffer::StringBuffer$append(java::lang::CharSequence*, > jint, jint)' cannot be overloaded > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/java/lang/StringBuffer.h:36: > error: with 'java::lang::StringBuffer* > java::lang::StringBuffer::StringBuffer$append(java::lang::CharSequence*, > jint, jint)' > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/java/lang/StringBuffer.h:102: > error: 'java::lang::AbstractStringBuffer* > java::lang::StringBuffer::StringBuffer$append(java::lang::CharSequence*)' > cannot be overloaded > /home/andrew/projects/classpath/gcj/sources/gcc/libjava/java/lang/StringBuffer.h:35: > error: with 'java::lang::StringBuffer* > java::lang::StringBuffer::StringBuffer$append(java::lang::CharSequence*)' > make[3]: *** [interpret.lo] Error 1 > > Is there an issue with gcj and the use of covariant return types from 1.5? > > The methods in question are StringBuffer.append(char), > StringBuffer.append(CharSequence,int,int) and > StringBuffer.append(CharSequence). All return a StirngBuffer and > override methods with the same signature but a return type of > AbstractStringBuffer in AbstractStringBuffer. > > Cheers,