Re: [classpath-0.98 merge branch] update and status

Andrew John Hughes schrieb:
> On 17:32 Sun 28 Sep     , Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>  - http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36763
>> outstanding?
>>
> 
> Is this not already on trunk? (it's the previous merge)
> There are plenty of VM 'holes' like these already on trunk
> so I can't see this being a blocker.

libgcj has some classes which shadow the classpath classes. while the merge is
ok, it doesn't affect the libgcj implementation. I did fil bug reports where I
did notice these diversions and didn't merge these into libgcj.

>> are we in a state where the merge can be proposed/announcd on gcc-patches?
>>
> 
> Did you see the Mauve results I posted?  There are a few GCJ-specific regressions
> (from 4.3), but not sure whether these are also on trunk.

how should we proceed? please file reports on gcc/libgcj. do you see these for
classpath builds as well?

  Matthias