Re: Question of the status of GCJ
Marco Trudel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Haley wrote: > Marco Trudel wrote: >> Andrew Haley wrote: >>> Mike Purdy wrote: >>>> Thank you Andrew. >>>> This is interesting. Does the OpenJDK allow native compilation? >>> No. >> But it would be possible with (relatively) less work. > > Relative to writing the whole thing again, maybe, but still hard. Actually, I was talking about finishing JENC, not reimplementing GCJ. Reimplementing GCJ would probably be much harder. By the way, I forgot to mention that a Java source code to Eiffel source code compiler automatically supports native compilation since Eiffel compiles to native by default (otherwise my whole mail would have been pointless)... Marco > I'd love to find an excuse to do it. gcj is still a very high- > performance implementation of the Java language. > > Andrew.