Re: GCJ with OpenJDK Java API instead of GNU Classpath

Andrew Haley wrote:
> That doesn't make it not a serious option.  It just means that
> you don't want to do it, and you don't think that the gcj
> community should do it.  It's still a serious option.
>   
Not really. The problem is that the test can only be run by special people
under special circumstances.
So only the binaries produced by those special people can be said to have
passed the test. People in general can't run the test, reproduce its 
results,
test bug fixes, and so on. Therefore it's not a useful option for an open
source project.