Re: namespace namespace

> Just so that I'm clear: what you are saying is that *both* gcj/g++ and gcjh
> need to be fixed.

gcj already does proper mangling, or at least it should - see gcc/java/mangle.c

> I believe that doing such, while necessary, would break the binary
> interface: in particular code which is compiled today to call into JAXP
> would not work with new versions of JAXP that are compiled with a version of
> gcj/g++ which has this fix.

This isn't an issue for Java code. Code compiled with
--indirect-dispatch does not use C++ symbols for linking.

Bryce