Re: Can gcj be a Java front-end for llvm as well?

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:18 -0700, Yuri wrote:
> The rationale for this is that llvm in many cases produces more optimal 
> code and it's good to have such option if it doesn't come at too high price.

When gcj/gcc produces sub-optimal code wouldn't it make more sense to
just fix gcj? Can you give some examples of such code?

Thanks,

Mark

P.S. There is http://vmkit.llvm.org/ladyvm.html if you need to use
llvm/vmkit. It might not produce the fastest runtime code, but it is a
quick way to mix and match various existing free software projects to
produce something gcj/java-like.