Re: RFD: Precompile ecj [Was Re: GCCMain not found & test suite errors fatal?]

David Daney <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andrew Haley wrote:
> This makes ecj1 (and therefore gcj with Java source) much faster but
> takes 1m30s of CPU on a very fast computer.  It doesn't really seem to
> make the build longer on a multi-CPU box, since it runs in parallel with
> the rest of the build AFAICS.  Do you think we can get away with this?
> 

Seems reasonable to me.


> Andrew.
> 
> 
> 2010-01-06  Andrew Haley  <[email protected]>
> 
> 	* Makefile.am (ecjx_LDFLAGS): Always precompile AWT.


This changelog mentions AWT.  Is that correct?



> 
> Index: Makefile.am
> ===================================================================
> --- Makefile.am (revision 155475)
> +++ Makefile.am (working copy)
> @@ -1075,30 +1075,20 @@
> 
>  ## Build an ecjx from a .jar.
>  ecjx_SOURCES = ecjx.cc
> -## We use the BC ABI here so that we don't need to compile ecj.jar.
> -## Hopefully the user has compiled it into his system .db.
> -## However, even if not it will run reasonably quickly.
> -
>  ECJX_BASE_FLAGS = -findirect-dispatch \
>         --main=org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain
> 
>  if NATIVE
> 
>  ecjx_LINK = $(GCJLINK) $(ecjx_LDFLAGS)
> -
> -if ENABLE_SHARED
> -## Use ecj.jar at runtime.
> -ecjx_LDFLAGS = $(ECJX_BASE_FLAGS) -Djava.class.path=$(ECJ_JAR)
> -else !ENABLE_SHARED
> -## Use ecj.jar at compile time.
>  ecjx_LDFLAGS = $(ECJX_BASE_FLAGS) $(ECJ_BUILD_JAR) -fbootclasspath=$(BOOTCLASSPATH)
> -endif !ENABLE_SHARED
> -
>  ecjx_LDADD = -L$(here)/.libs $(extra_ldflags)
>  ecjx_DEPENDENCIES = libgcj.la libgcj.spec
>  if BUILD_SUBLIBS
>  ecjx_DEPENDENCIES += libgcj-noncore.la
> +
>  endif
> +
>  if USE_LIBGCJ_BC
>  ecjx_DEPENDENCIES += libgcj_bc.la
>  else
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.