Re: GC leaks debugging
Andrew Haley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/04/11 09:39, Erik Groeneveld wrote: > L.S., > > I am debugging memory leaks in the GC of libgcj. Generally, libgcj > performs well, but there are some cases in which the heap literally > explodes over time. I wish to solve this. The OpenJDK vm runs the same > tests without any leaking. > > I compiled GCC 4.6, build with --enable-libgcj-debug=yes and started > testing with GC_DUMP_REGULARLY=1. From the results I have a few > questions to understand it better. I am still in a phase of > pinpointing a minimal program to demonstrate the problem, and I would > like to get hints as to search further. > > 1. The finalization table entries keeps on increasing up to 39344 > until it is killed, but the objects which are eligible for immediate > finalization remains 0. It seems that no finalization takes place. > Could you give any hints as to what could be the reason for this? It > logs: > > ***Finalization statistics: > 39344 finalization table entries; 48 disappearing links > 0 objects are eligible for immediate finalization > > ***Static roots: > From 0x804b284 to 0x804bf1c (temporary) > From 0xb716d000 to 0xb7854cdc (temporary) > From 0xb55ba92c to 0xb562ddbc (temporary) > Total size: 7716356 > > > 2. There is a fair amount of black-listing. From reading about the > GC, I understand that the GC knows what is a pointer and what not > because there is type information associated with the Java objects. > So I'd expect no black-listing at all. It that a right observation? No. Objects are scanned precisely, but the stack is not. Also, depending on your compilation options, the data segments of your program may be scanned conservatively. Andrew.