Re: GC leaks debugging
Bryce McKinlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Andrew Haley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/04/11 19:42, Erik Groeneveld wrote: >> Meanwhile, I'd like to pursue a better solution - less of a hack. Any >> interest in helping out? > > Before you go any further, it's worth remembering that you're using an > old version of the GC. I've been told that "Of course, [the new gc] > will require modification of boehm.cc in GCJ" but not why. > > It looks like you're making progress, but I urge you to move to the > new gc or your time may be wasted on the old one. Now would certainly be a good time to work on a boehm-gc import, with GCC in stage 1. Note that Kai Tietz has recently expressed interest in working on this, too: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-04/msg00006.html "svn import" and "svn merge" are your friends here. The unmodified upstream sources from the last time we merged are tagged as GC_6_6. IIRC, the local modifications at that time were fairly minimal, mostly just configure changes. If you import the current sources with a similar tag, it'll make it easy to get a diff of the GCC tree's current divergences, which can then be submitted upstream if appropriate. Bryce