Re: gcj and debugging
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:32:37 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 02/11/2013 04:26 PM, Michael Haupt wrote: > Tom, > > thank you very much for your reply. > > Am 07.02.2013 um 19:47 schrieb Tom Tromey <[email protected]>: >> Michael> in a research project, I'm generating DWARF debugging info for machine >> Michael> code generated from Java. I looked at some of the DWARF debug info >> Michael> generated by gcj (including that contained in libgcj.so). >> >> I think the first thing to realize is that the gdb support for Java was >> all written to target gcj specifically, and also written long ago and >> then barely updated. >> >> It isn't very general or done the way it would be done now. >> It was never updated for the gcj binary compatibility ABI. > > Would you suggest to generate DWARF info with the language set to C89 then, to avoid misleading gdb? > >> I thought things like "print array[0]" used to work, but even that seems >> to fail for me now. There is definitely some code for this in gdb, see >> jv-valprint.c:java_value_print. It seems to know a bit about array >> layout and then goes from there (though the code looks somewhat bogus to >> me...). See also jv-lang.c:evaluate_subexp_java for the code that tries >> to do array subscripting. > > If gdb's Java language support is really tailored to gcj, it surely assumes internal layout details about arrays. I cannot guarantee that "my" arrays have the same internal representation. :-) > >> gdb has special code for this. It looks for a type named >> "java.lang.String" and then knows what fields it has. >> >> Yucky. > > Indeed. The Right Way to do it, as is done with the thread library, is to have a target library that GDB opens which contains accessor methods for all of the VM's structures. Andrew.