Re: Clarification and apologies (was Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system)

Brian Jones <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:53:49 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.java.classpath.devel,gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel
Message-ID	<CAACpEXK4z404M4u3qHd925xHHQKpYgbg=bGfazT1uEjKjY+mfA@mail.gmail.com>

GCJ needs to use IcedTea.  Unfortunately the difference between most Java
developers who want to compile Java to a native executable and a GCC hacker
is vast.

Brian


On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Andrew Haley <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 09/05/2014 12:07 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> > After reading in a previous post that Classpath was not being
> > "actively developed" anymore, I said that it would be a pity to let
> > the project die, and suggested that perhaps it was time to look for an
> > adopter (
> http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2014-August/003270.html
> )
>
> That was perhaps my fault; I said it was not being actively developed,
> when I should have said it was not much being actively developed.
> That's a subtle distinction, but one that matters to some people.
>
> Andrew.
>
>