Re: Status of GNU Classpath
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia via Java <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Feb 2023 16:55:57 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.devel,gmane.comp.java.classpath.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABDcavb=oFFU7JLn6fW88hRzBu5QwGgHrGzXnwnaxOfMTf9eNA@mail.gmail.com> |
El mi=C3=A9, 8 feb 2023 a las 11:50, Ricardo Wurmus (<[email protected]>) = escribi=C3=B3: > > Hi Ricardo, > > > >> > I can see that development halted around 2016 (from the commit logs = of > >> > the official git repo), but would like to know if someone else is > >> > still using GNU Classpath. > >> > >> GNU Guix is using GNU Classpath in the bootstrap path from C to modern= JDKs. > [=E2=80=A6] > > I understand that the above already does the job, and that GNU > > Classpath is not used in Guix anymore once OpenJDK is built. Is this > > correct? > > Classpath does not end up being used in applications at *runtime*, but > it remains part of the bootstrap chain forever. In Guix we merely cache > build artifacts, but the build inputs (instructions and the closure of > all sources) are never fully divorced from the build outputs. In other > words: we cannot ever *not* build Classpath if we want to build > OpenJDK. Users only avoid building out the full bootstrap chain by > downloading substitutes for a local build =E2=80=94 but the builds themse= lves > must happen somewhere (in this case on the build farm). > > We also rebuild the complete bootstrap chain whenever its inputs > change. For Classpath and the OpenJDK this would happen, for example, > when we use a new default C compiler, or any of the input libraries or > tools change. > > We will need to continue to be able to build Classpath and all of the > other early Java things for as long as Java packages should be buildable > by Guix. Over the years this may require minor tweaks and patches. Thank you Ricardo. Given the specific needs of your use case I would like to ask the following= : Would Guix be interested in new releases of GNU Classpath? Or are the current releases (0.93 + 0.99 + devel) "good enough" for what you need? Thanks, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia [email protected]