Re: [Gc] Re: boehm-gc merge for GCC
Matthias Klose <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.patches,gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[CCing java-patches and Andrew too] I'm currently striving for something for the 4.8 release. Not sure if relying on an external library is the right thing to do for the 4.8 release. Currently boehm-gc is linked to libgcj as a convenience library. I remember that trying to link boehm-gc as a shared library did cause some performance regressions (although I think I did only check this in the early 4.x times). Please could you elaborate on the API changes in gcj? There is also a second user of boehm-gc in GCC, when you configure with --enable-objc-gc. I didn't check yet which changes are needed for that. Would it be possible to create a branch in the GCC svn, and then prepare the merge, and libjava and libobjc changes there? Matthias Am 16.11.2012 22:14, schrieb NightStrike: > I think changing the gc to be like gmp/mpfr/mpc requires buy-in from > Andrew Haley, if I'm not mistaken. > > Kai, is my statement correct? > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Ivan Maidanski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi NightStrike, >> >> In my understanding, I've done bdwgc ready for gcj but some gcj files should >> be changed to reflect the changes in bdwgc API (e.g., thread registration). >> There is a problem is thread suspend/resume - bdwgc does not have such API >> but OTOH suspend/resume is deprecated part of Java threads. Regarding >> integration bdwgc into gcj, I think it's better to have bdwgc as a separate >> module (similar to libmpfr). >> >> I have an intention to do the work but this requires significant efforts to >> make it perfect, so I gave up due to lack of time. >> >> Any volunteers? >> >> Regards, >> Ivan >> >> 16 11 2012 15:28:34 from NightStrike <[email protected]>: >> >> Are there any plans to get current boehm-gc into gcc? Ivan, can you do this? >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ivan Maidanski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> I think yes, all patches (may be with some modifications) from Kai are in >>> master. >>> I myself also reviewed difference between gcc/boehm-gc >>> (https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/tree/gcc_boehmgc) and gc6.8. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ivan >>> >>> 16 11 2012 18:22:47 Matthias Klose <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi Ivan, >>> >>> in >>> >>> http://old.nabble.com/RFC%3A-Updating-boehm-gc-to-verion-7.2-(alpha-5)-td31293737.html >>> >>> Kai said that he did some patches upstream / to you about changes >>> collected >>> in >>> the GCC copy of boehm-gc. Are these integrated in your branch/trunk, or >>> could >>> you forward these to me? I didn't get any feedback from Kai this week, >>> therefor >>> asking you directly. >>> >>> Thanks, Matthias