Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname
Andrew Haley <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:23:24 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote: > No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases taken from > the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same > GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSIONs. > >> > Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life? > This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential change for > GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. I want to keep it that way, not change it with every > release from the gcc-5 branch. Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC version numbering, I guess? So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we now have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3? If that's the idea, your patch is OK. Thanks, Andrew.