Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname

Andrew Haley <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:23:24 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.java.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote:
> No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases taken from 
> the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same 
> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSIONs.
> 
>> > Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life?
> This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential change for 
> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION.  I want to keep it that way, not change it with every 
> release from the gcc-5 branch.

Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC version
numbering, I guess?  So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we now
have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3?

If that's the idea, your patch is OK.

Thanks,

Andrew.