Re: [patch] [java] bump libgcj soname

On 03.01.2016 20:01, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Matthias Klose <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 03.01.2016 17:23, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases taken from
>>>> the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same
>>>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSIONs.
>>>>
>>>>>> Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life?
>>>> This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential change for
>>>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION.  I want to keep it that way, not change it with every
>>>> release from the gcc-5 branch.
>>>
>>> Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC version
>>> numbering, I guess?  So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we now
>>> have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3?
>>
>> yes, exactly.
>
> But, isn’t there a trunk version of this patch?  I mean, the same issue applies to it and gcc 6, gcc 7 and gcc 8, no?

yes, r232040.