Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ
Peter Bergner <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:16:12 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.java.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/21/16 10:40 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 21.11.2016 17:23, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> On 11/21/2016 05:57 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I'm sure you didn't mean exactly the same --with-foo in all 3 places, but I'm a
>> dummy about what you really intended to say here.
>
> ahh, didn't see that :-/ Now fixed, is this clearer now?
>
> The options @option{--with-target-bdw-gc-include} and
> @option{--with-target-bdw-gc-lib} must always specified together for
> each multilib variant and take precedence over
> @option{--with-target-bdw-gc}. If none of these options are
> specified, the values are taken from the @command{pkg-config}
> @samp{bdw-gc} module.
s/must always specified/must always be specified/
and possibly:
s/variant and take precedence/variant and they take precedence/ ???
Peter