Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc: describe the lane freedom of the widen_ssum and widen_usum patterns
Richard Biener <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:57:11 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026, [email protected] wrote: > From: Kyrylo Tkachov <[email protected]> > > The documentation of widen_ssum and widen_usum says only that operand 1 is > added to operand 2, which reads as though each element of operand 1 has to > be accumulated into the element of operand 0 at the same position. Nothing > says the pattern is only ever used for a reassociable reduction, so a port > cannot tell from the documentation whether it is allowed to regroup the > input elements, for example by using a pairwise widening add. > > vect_recog_widen_sum_pattern only forms WIDEN_SUM_EXPR through > vect_reassociating_reduction_p, which requires the > statement to be a reduction, refuses a statement nested in the inner loop > of an outer-loop vectorization because the order of the computation matters > there, and refuses a type that needs a fold-left reduction. The comment on > the pattern already describes the idiom as producing N/2 results by summing > up pairs of intermediate results. The accumulator is only ever consumed by > a horizontal sum in the epilogue, so the distribution of input elements > over accumulator lanes is not observable. > > Spell that out, and note the constraint that comes with it: an > implementation that adds elements before they reach the width of operand 0 > has to widen them first so that no intermediate sum can overflow. > > Is it okay to document this relaxation so that patch 2 can make use of > it in the aarch64 backend? I wonder if this is a step in the correct direction, see PR67612 where we want to apply a SLP pattern to exercise the actual lane mapping done. Do we want to have separate optabs for this? IMO what you document would be better named reduc_widen_ssum_optab (as opposed to reduc_widen_ssum_scal_optab or widen_ssum_optab). Where the _scal variant would be expected to accumulate to a scalar (or lane zero), the reduc_*_optab would be free in how to accumulate lanes and the widen_ssum_optab would lay out exactly which source lanes are summed to which destination lanes (I hope ISAs have matching behavior here). But sure, your patch documents the existing use. Richard. > Thanks, > Kyrill > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/md.texi (widen_ssum@var{n}@var{m}3, widen_usum@var{n}@var{m}3): > Document that the assignment of input elements to accumulator > elements is unconstrained, and fix a typo. > > Signed-off-by: Kyrylo Tkachov <[email protected]> > --- > gcc/doc/md.texi | 15 +++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi > index c0026c17318..3235d456874 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/md.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi > @@ -5097,10 +5097,21 @@ in operand 0, which is of the same mode as operand 3. > @itemx @samp{widen_usum@var{n}@var{m}3} > Operands 0 and 2 are of the same mode, which is wider than the mode of > operand 1. Add operand 1 to operand 2 and place the widened result in > -operand 0. (This is used express accumulation of elements into an accumulator > -of a wider mode.) > +operand 0. (This is used to express accumulation of elements into an > +accumulator of a wider mode.) > @var{m} is the mode of operand 1 and @var{n} is the mode of operand 0. > > +These patterns are only used for a reduction whose summation the vectorizer > +has already established may be reassociated, and the accumulator is reduced > +to a scalar by a horizontal sum once the loop is done. An implementation is > +therefore free to choose which elements of operand 1 it accumulates into > +which element of operand 0, so long as every element of operand 1 is > +accumulated exactly once. In particular it may add adjacent elements of > +operand 1 to each other before accumulating them, which is what a pairwise > +widening add instruction does. Doing so must not lose any value, so an > +implementation that adds elements together before they reach the width of > +operand 0 has to widen them enough for the intermediate sums to be exact. > + > @mdindex smulhs@var{m}3 > @mdindex umulhs@var{m}3 > @item @samp{smulhs@var{m}3} > -- Richard Biener <[email protected]> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Jochen Jaser, Andrew McDonald, Abhinav Puri; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)