Re: [PATCH v2] tree-optimization: Recognize add/sub absolute-value idiom [PR56223]
Naveen SiddeGowda <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 13:29:10 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKz2E_coq4BcJdbY+iyfnCKDjVAgHGjLksW2seW9sWRmQ+BfSw@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000003056df0658482652 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Jeff, Thanks for reviewing the patch and suggested modifications. >> I think we can side-step this class of problems by checking if (GIMPLE) in addition to the type tests your doing. Done. >> With the additional check to force these patterns to only fire for >> GIMPLE this is OK to push to the trunk after the usual testing. Modified and tested with no regressions. Pushed the patch to the trunk. Thanks, Naveen --0000000000003056df0658482652 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Jeff,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for reviewing the patch= and suggested modifications.<br><br>>> I think we can side-step this= class of problems by checking if (GIMPLE) in addition to the type tests yo= ur doing.=C2=A0</div><div>Done.<br><br>>> With the additional check t= o force these patterns to only fire for <br>>> GIMPLE this is OK to p= ush to the trunk after the usual testing.<br>Modified and tested with no re= gressions.</div><div>Pushed the patch to the trunk.</div><div><br></div><di= v>Thanks,</div><div>Naveen<br><br></div></div> --0000000000003056df0658482652--