RE: [PATCH v1 1/3] RISC-V: Allow RVV register overlap for vwmulsu.vv

"Li, Pan2" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:30:51 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.patches
Message-ID <DS3PR11MB98442E8F178CF1315F15AEA3A9D22@DS3PR11MB9844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
I see, thanks Robin.

Only the test cases are LLM-assisted, but it will add that tag automatically when you ask help from LLM.
I will make it clear before commit, as well as the underlying patches.

Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Dapp <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2026 10:51 PM
To: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Chen, Ken <[email protected]>; Liu, Hongtao <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] RISC-V: Allow RVV register overlap for vwmulsu.vv

> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>

I hope/guess you just default-added this to all of your messages?
While assisted-by/co-authored-by would be OK for a testsuite change, it 
generally isn't for regular code.  While this is of course a carbon copy 
of all the related changes, it's not a direct refactoring either and 
IMHO it's at least ambiguous.  I'm not very happy having to play 
"copyright lawyer" now... but I think this is still fine.

Legal insignificance is an exception to the general policy that 
LLM-assisted code is not OK.

So this is OK but instead of just adding the tag, in the future please 
also state why you think the particular assisted-by change is legally 
insignificant.  Otherwise we cannot ACK it.

-- 
Regards
 Robin