Re: [PATCH] vect: Recognise high-part multiply when the wide type has no vector form
Andrea Pinski <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 23:56:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALvbMcD-XD0js7T=NwRFgEqBqf4Ynr0_eOezomx3C_C45VVeXA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:48 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Kyrylo Tkachov <[email protected]> > > vect_recog_mulhs_pattern turns (a * b) >> N into IFN_MULH and casts the > result back to the type of the shift, which the over-widening machinery > then drops. Building that cast needs a vector type for the wide type, and > the pattern gives up when there is none. > > For a 64-bit high-part multiply the wide type is 128 bits, and no target > has a vector of 128-bit integers, so on AArch64 the pattern never fires > for scalable SVE and the loop stays scalar. It does fire under > -msve-vector-bits=128, where the prevailing vector size is 128 bits and a > one-element TImode vector exists, which is what makes the failure specific > to variable-length vectors. > > The pattern has already established that the users of the result need at > most min_output_precision bits and that NEW_TYPE holds at least that many, > so when the wide vector type is unavailable we can simply leave the result > at NEW_TYPE precision and skip the cast. > > for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) > d[i] = (uint64_t) (((unsigned __int128) a[i] * b[i]) >> 64); > > on -march=armv8.2-a+sve2 now gives > > ld1d z28.d, p7/z, [x1, x6, lsl 3] > ld1d z27.d, p7/z, [x2, x6, lsl 3] > umulh z28.d, z28.d, z27.d > st1d z28.d, p7, [x0, x6, lsl 3] > > instead of a scalar loop. > > Bootstrapped and regression-tested on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu and > x86_64-linux. > > Ok for trunk? > Thanks, > Kyrill > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * tree-vect-patterns.cc (vect_recog_mulhs_pattern): Keep the > pattern result at NEW_TYPE precision when LHS_TYPE has no vector > type. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_1.c: New test. > * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_run.c: New test. Should there be a testcase in gcc.dg/vect too? > > Signed-off-by: Kyrylo Tkachov <[email protected]> > --- > .../aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_1.c | 23 ++++++++++ > .../aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_run.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++ > gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc | 17 ++++++-- > 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_1.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_run.c > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_1.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..f61d235b7a8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_1.c > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +/* A 64-bit high-part multiply has a 128-bit product type, and there is no > + scalable vector of 128-bit integers. Check that the vectoriser recognises > + the high-part multiply anyway. */ > +/* { dg-do assemble { target aarch64_asm_sve2_ok } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -march=armv8.2-a+sve2 -mautovec-preference=sve-only -msve-vector-bits=scalable --save-temps" } */ > + > +#include <stdint.h> > + > +#define DEF_LOOP(TYPE, WIDE) \ > + void __attribute__ ((noipa)) \ > + mulh_##TYPE (TYPE *restrict dst, TYPE *restrict a, \ > + TYPE *restrict b, int count) \ > + { \ > + for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i) \ > + dst[i] = (TYPE) (((WIDE) a[i] * b[i]) >> 64); \ > + } > + > +DEF_LOOP (int64_t, __int128) > +DEF_LOOP (uint64_t, unsigned __int128) > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tsmulh\tz[0-9]+\.d, z[0-9]+\.d, z[0-9]+\.d\n} 1 } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\tumulh\tz[0-9]+\.d, z[0-9]+\.d, z[0-9]+\.d\n} 1 } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\twhilelo\t} } } */ > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_run.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_run.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..d856302d7a1 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mul_highpart_scalable_run.c > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > +/* { dg-do run { target aarch64_sve_hw } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize -march=armv8.2-a+sve2 -mautovec-preference=sve-only -msve-vector-bits=scalable" } */ > + > +#include "mul_highpart_scalable_1.c" > + > +#define N 77 > + > +static int64_t sa[N], sb[N], sd[N]; > +static uint64_t ua[N], ub[N], ud[N]; > + > +int > +main (void) > +{ > + uint64_t s = 0x243f6a8885a308d3ULL; > + for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) > + { > + s ^= s << 13; s ^= s >> 7; s ^= s << 17; > + sa[i] = (int64_t) s; > + ua[i] = s; > + s ^= s << 13; s ^= s >> 7; s ^= s << 17; > + sb[i] = (int64_t) s; > + ub[i] = s; > + } > + sa[0] = INT64_MIN; sb[0] = INT64_MIN; > + sa[1] = INT64_MIN; sb[1] = -1; > + sa[2] = -1; sb[2] = -1; > + ua[0] = 0; ub[0] = ~0ULL; > + ua[1] = ~0ULL; ub[1] = ~0ULL; > + ua[2] = 1ULL << 63; ub[2] = 1ULL << 63; > + > + mulh_int64_t (sd, sa, sb, N); > + mulh_uint64_t (ud, ua, ub, N); > + > + for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) > + { > + if (sd[i] != (int64_t) (((__int128) sa[i] * sb[i]) >> 64)) > + __builtin_abort (); > + if (ud[i] != (uint64_t) (((unsigned __int128) ua[i] * ub[i]) >> 64)) > + __builtin_abort (); > + } > + return 0; > +} > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc > index c57e215be57..9934ab8306a 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc > @@ -3412,11 +3412,20 @@ vect_recog_mulhs_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, > (ifn, new_vectype, OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED)) > return NULL; > > - /* The IR requires a valid vector type for the cast result, even though > - it's likely to be discarded. */ > + /* The IFN result is cast back to LHS_TYPE, a cast that the over-widening > + machinery then drops. Some targets have no vector form of LHS_TYPE at > + all: a 64-bit high-part multiply has a 128-bit LHS_TYPE, and there is no > + vector of 128-bit integers. Keep the pattern result at NEW_TYPE > + precision in that case. This is safe because the check at the top of the > + function proved that the users of the result need at most > + TARGET_PRECISION bits, and NEW_TYPE holds at least that many. */ > + tree out_type = lhs_type; > *type_out = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, lhs_type); > if (!*type_out) > - return NULL; > + { > + out_type = new_type; > + *type_out = new_vectype; > + } > > /* Generate the IFN_MULHRS call. */ > tree new_var = vect_recog_temp_ssa_var (new_type, NULL); > @@ -3432,7 +3441,7 @@ vect_recog_mulhs_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, > dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, > "created pattern stmt: %G", (gimple *) mulhrs_stmt); > > - return vect_convert_output (vinfo, last_stmt_info, lhs_type, > + return vect_convert_output (vinfo, last_stmt_info, out_type, > mulhrs_stmt, new_vectype); > } > > -- > 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) >