Re: [PATCH] match: fold a remainder compared with its dividend

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026, 7:13 AM Jeffrey Law <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On 8/13/2026 3:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I think we're also seeing a lot of (unattributed) LLM assisted patches
> lately.
> Virtual certainty.   The bits I've been using for reviews do provide LLM
> scoring for the main patch and the testsuite changes.  I'm not using
> that scoring for much at this time; I don't trust it yet and even if it
> did, the primary use would be to trigger me to look at the patch deeper
> on the assumption the LLM mucked up something.
> >
> > I have used LLMs to do offline bug analysis with moderate success and
> > I might want
> > to play with LLMs taking up the daily churn of going through bugzilla,
> > adding missing
> > classification, etc. - but that would make LLM modify bugs ....
> Yea, I think bug classification, de-duplication and the like, etc would
> all be good uses.   I'd bet that as the dust settles we could revisit
> the guidelines with an eye towards this space.
>


I think bug reports should not be touched by llms. People are expecting
human responses.
 That is the bugzilla changes should be added manually and not interfaced
from a llm. Support to users should be human interactions. Otherwise it
feels dry and folks will just ignore filing bugs.

Our policy about automated filing bug reports should be banned for the same
reason.

Also the number of issues going up is not a big issue. I and others go
through old issues to see if they have been fixed on a regular basis and
even mark things as duplicates when issues are filed. (And find old bugs
which are duplicates at that point too).

We should make sure human interactions are there for the community which
includes our users.






> jeff
>