Re: [Patch, fortran] PR110626 - [13/14/15/16/17 regression] Duplicated finalization in derived

On 8/15/26 17:19, Jerry Delisle wrote:

> ```Yes, this is ok, thanks Paul```
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026, 6:40 AM Paul Richard Thomas 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
> 
>     Hello All,
> 
>     This patch by Christopher Albert, with assistance from both GPT and
>     Claude, pushes the suggested limit of ~15 lines sourced from LLMs.
>     However, I think that it is a sufficiently important regression as to
>     be given consideration. I have checked it over and cannot fault it. I
>     reduced the verbosity of the comments somewhat.
> 
>     OK for all active branches after regression testing on each and a
>     delay between mainline and the others?
> 
>     Cheers
> 
>     Paul
> 
I got a request from one member of the working group on AI policy:

"Hi Paul,

Could you clarify what you mean by "sourced from"? If the lines came
from an LLM, please make sure to use the Assisted-by git trailer
mentioned at https://gcc.gnu.org/ai-policy.html under 'Transparency &
Accountability'.

Also, if the patch by Christopher Albert, he should be the git author,
so use git commit --amend --author="Christopher Albert
<[email protected]>". You can add yourself as Co-authored-by if you did
some work on it too."

I think it is important to take this advice in consideration.

Kind regards,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: [email protected] - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands