Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add vect_finish_stmt_generation for sequences
Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALvbMcDwVHzxtqn6sm-zsBPRCTbC3x-5cCLGpwNEyYbBsj_5HQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 11:01 PM H.J. Lu <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 6:36 AM H.J. Lu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 8:13 PM Richard Biener <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The following attempts to make using gimple_build easier during > > > vectorizer code generation by providing an overload of > > > vect_finish_stmt_generation that handles a built sequence. > > > In addition to inserting and finishing stmts on the sequence the > > > ultimate result is made to be based on the passed vectorizer > > > temporary (that gets us the fancy names). > > > > > > I have converted one instance in vectorizable_conversion which > > > I'll need to handle both NOP_EXPR and VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR which > > > gimple_build happily does correctly, but vect_gimple_build does > > > not. > > > > > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > > > > > > Does this look sensible? I can of course sepecial-case > > > VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR manually as well. > > > > > > * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vect_finish_stmt_generation): New > > > overload for gimple_build sequences. > > > (vectorizable_conversion): Convert one instance of > > > vect_gimple_build to gimple_build plus > > > vect_finish_stmt_generation. > > > --- > > > gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc > > > index a023977bc51..44090015e7a 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc > > > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc > > > @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ vect_get_vec_defs (vec_info *, slp_tree slp_node, > > > > > > /* Helper function called by vect_finish_replace_stmt and > > > vect_finish_stmt_generation. Set the location of the new > > > - statement and create and return a stmt_vec_info for it. */ > > > + statement. */ > > > > > > static void > > > vect_finish_stmt_generation_1 (vec_info *, > > > @@ -1285,8 +1285,7 @@ vect_finish_stmt_generation_1 (vec_info *, > > > } > > > > > > /* Replace the scalar statement STMT_INFO with a new vector statement VEC_STMT, > > > - which sets the same scalar result as STMT_INFO did. Create and return a > > > - stmt_vec_info for VEC_STMT. */ > > > + which sets the same scalar result as STMT_INFO did. */ > > > > > > void > > > vect_finish_replace_stmt (vec_info *vinfo, > > > @@ -1302,7 +1301,7 @@ vect_finish_replace_stmt (vec_info *vinfo, > > > } > > > > > > /* Add VEC_STMT to the vectorized implementation of STMT_INFO and insert it > > > - before *GSI. Create and return a stmt_vec_info for VEC_STMT. */ > > > + before *GSI. */ > > > > > > void > > > vect_finish_stmt_generation (vec_info *vinfo, > > > @@ -1344,6 +1343,31 @@ vect_finish_stmt_generation (vec_info *vinfo, > > > vect_finish_stmt_generation_1 (vinfo, stmt_info, vec_stmt); > > > } > > > > > > +/* Add the stmts in STMTS to the vectorized implementation of STMT_INFO and > > > + insert them before *GSI. Make sure the final stmt has a result > > > + based on VAR. */ > > > + > > > +void > > > +vect_finish_stmt_generation (vec_info *vinfo, > > > + stmt_vec_info stmt_info, gimple_seq &stmts, > > > + tree var, gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi) > > > +{ > > > + auto si = gsi_start (stmts); > > > + while (!gsi_end_p (si)) > > > + { > > > + gimple *new_stmt = gsi_stmt (si); > > > + gsi_remove (&si, false); > > > + if (gsi_end_p (si)) > > > + { > > > + tree lhs = gimple_get_lhs (new_stmt); > > > + gcc_assert (!SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs)); > > > + SET_SSA_NAME_VAR_OR_IDENTIFIER (lhs, var); > > > + } > > > + vect_finish_stmt_generation (vinfo, stmt_info, new_stmt, gsi); > > > + } > > > +} > > > + > > > + > > > /* We want to vectorize a call to combined function CFN with function > > > decl FNDECL, using VECTYPE_OUT as the type of the output and VECTYPE_IN > > > as the types of all inputs. Check whether this is possible using > > > @@ -5797,12 +5821,11 @@ vectorizable_conversion (vec_info *vinfo, > > > } > > > else > > > { > > > - new_stmt = vect_gimple_build (vec_dest, code1, vop0); > > > - new_temp = make_ssa_name (vec_dest, new_stmt); > > > - gimple_set_lhs (new_stmt, new_temp); > > > - vect_finish_stmt_generation (vinfo, stmt_info, new_stmt, gsi); > > > - > > > - slp_node->push_vec_def (new_stmt); > > > + gimple_seq stmts = NULL; > > > + new_temp = gimple_build (&stmts, code1, vectype_out, vop0); > > > + vect_finish_stmt_generation (vinfo, stmt_info, > > > + stmts, vec_dest, gsi); > > > + slp_node->push_vec_def (new_temp); > > > } > > > } > > > break; > > > -- > > > 2.51.0 > > > > > > > I need the patch enclosed here to avoid ICE in 2 testcases included > > Here is the updated patch with 3 tests. > > > in the patch. But I got another ICE in bad.c: > > > > [hjl@gnu-zen4-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -S -O2 -march=x86-64 ~/bugs/gcc/cvise-1/bad.c > > during GIMPLE pass: thread > > /export/home/hjl/bugs/gcc/cvise-1/bad.c: In function ‘collate_output___o_2’: > > /export/home/hjl/bugs/gcc/cvise-1/bad.c:20:1: internal compiler error: > > Segmentation fault > > This is > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126876 The big comment about HJL's patch is `code1 == NOP_EXPR` should be `CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (code1)` instead. > > > -- > H.J.