Re: optimization/10862: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function

Diego Novillo <[email protected]> 19 May 2003 11:27:21 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.gcc.bugs,gmane.comp.gcc.prs
Organization	Red Hat Canada
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 10:51, [email protected] wrote:
> Synopsis: [tree-ssa] Segfault for (essentially) empty function
> 
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->law
> Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth
> Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 19 14:51:18 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
>     Jeff, you had been doing the tree-ssa C++ stuff, right? Or
>     is there someone else whom I could bother?
>
It's not actually a C++ problem.  It was a bug in DCE when removing a
conditional that had no basic blocks after it.

>     Besides, apart from this one and 10863 (which triggers 
>     _really_ frequent on my code), the tree-ssa branch seems
>     to be in pretty good shape -- thanks!
>
I'm glad to hear that.  Thanks for testing!


Diego.