RE: optimization/8474: -mcpu=i686 produces much faster code than -mcpu=pentium4 on a P4 machine
Dara Hazeghi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.prs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following reply was made to PR optimization/8474; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi <[email protected]> To: Dave <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: optimization/8474: -mcpu=i686 produces much faster code than -mcpu=pentium4 on a P4 machine Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:38:50 -0700 (PDT) --- Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > New results are attached - sorry for the delay (been > busy lately). No problem. It doesn't look like the problem is solved, so I guess we'll leave the PR open, and hope somebody notices it... Thanks for your feedback, Dara > > These were run on Red Hat 9 (I installed that rather > than Mandrake v9.1) > rather than the original RH 8 system. > > Doesn't seem to be any improvement for P4 or with > gcc 3.4. > > - Dave > > On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 19:43, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > > Doh, I forgot to statically link the 3.4 ones (new > > version of libstdc++). Just a sec... > > > > Here, I statically linked them (the 3.4 ones) this > > time. > > > > Dara > > > whetstone took: 1.05 secs for 952 MFLOPS (w/ math > lib) > whetstone took: 0.39 secs for 2564 MFLOPS (w/o math > lib) > > whet33p4 > whetstone took: 1.04 secs for 962 MFLOPS (w/ math > lib) > whetstone took: 0.40 secs for 2500 MFLOPS (w/o math > lib) > > whet34p3 > whetstone took: 1.05 secs for 952 MFLOPS (w/ math > lib) > whetstone took: 0.40 secs for 2500 MFLOPS (w/o math > lib) > > whet34p4 > whetstone took: 1.06 secs for 943 MFLOPS (w/ math > lib) > whetstone took: 0.39 secs for 2564 MFLOPS (w/o math > lib) > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com