Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression

Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gcc.prs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following reply was made to PR c/10826; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
To: Janis Johnson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
   [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:09:37 -0700

 On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 06:35:22PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
 > It doesn't seem to be a regression after all, but a fix.
 
 Indeed it is.  The sample code for this pr is not valid C++,
 and the GCC C extension mirrors the C++ feature.
 
 
 r~
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.